AI在线 AI在线

Authors' Class-Action Lawsuit Against Anthropic: Accusing It of Stealing Millions of Books to Train AI

A federal judge in California recently ruled that three authors can file a class-action lawsuit on behalf of all American authors who have had their works downloaded from a pirated library, accusing AI company Anthropic of copyright infringement. The lawsuit was filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson in August last year.

A federal judge in California recently ruled that three authors can file a class-action lawsuit on behalf of all American authors who have had their works downloaded from a pirated library, accusing AI company Anthropic of copyright infringement. The lawsuit was filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson in August last year. They allege that Anthropic built a business worth billions of dollars by stealing hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books.

Copyright, Patent

Court documents stated that Anthropic downloaded up to 7 million books from a pirated library without authorization, an act described as similar to the early music-sharing website Napster. The ruling has drawn widespread attention because it not only involves the protection of copyright but also relates to the development and ethics of artificial intelligence technology.

Last month, a federal judge had supported Anthropic's argument, stating that books legally purchased by the company for training AI models fell under fair use. However, the judge also emphasized that Anthropic would still face individual trials for using allegedly pirated books. This suggests that even if part of the usage is legal, it cannot conceal its potential infringement.

Additionally, Reddit recently also filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, claiming that its chatbot accessed Reddit over 100,000 times without authorization. Anthropic had stated that it would prevent its bot from accessing the platform.

This lawsuit reflects the increasingly complex relationship between media, platforms, companies, and creative individuals. More and more creators are taking legal action, accusing AI companies of copyright infringement. For example, Universal Music also sued Anthropic in 2023, claiming that its "systematically and extensively infringes on its copyrighted lyrics." At the same time, some creators choose to collaborate with AI companies, actively providing training data in hopes of receiving a share of the revenue.

This lawsuit has sparked a wide-ranging discussion about artificial intelligence technology and its impact on the creative industry. How it will develop in the future is something we should continue to pay attention to.

Key Points:

📚 Three authors have filed a class-action lawsuit, accusing Anthropic of stealing millions of books.

⚖️ The judge ruled that Anthropic will face an individual trial for allegedly using pirated books.

🤖 Media and creators are increasingly concerned about copyright infringement by AI companies, and the number of related lawsuits continues to rise.

相关资讯

Group of Writers Sue Anthropic: Accuse of Unauthorized Use of Millions of Books to Train AI, Copyright Dispute Escalates!

Recently, three authors have jointly filed a class-action lawsuit against AI company Anthropic, accusing the company of using a large number of pirated books to train its AI model without permission. This lawsuit has attracted widespread attention and has also prompted new reflections on the relationship between AI technology and creators.According to reports, the authors claim that Anthropic used millions of e-books, including some copyrighted works, without authorization when training its AI system.
7/21/2025 4:22:44 PM
AI在线

Image Giant Getty Images Reverses Core Copyright Lawsuit Against Stability AI, UK Case Continues

Recently, Getty Images announced in the High Court of London that it had withdrawn its main copyright infringement claims against Stability AI, further narrowing the focus of this closely watched legal battle. The core of this lawsuit revolves around how AI companies use copyrighted content to train their models.Image source note: The image is AI-generated, and the image licensing service is Midjourney.Although Getty Images' dismissal did not end the case, the company is still pursuing other charges and has filed an independent lawsuit in the United States. This development highlights the ambiguous territory between content ownership and usage rights in the era of generative AI.
6/26/2025 5:01:39 PM
AI在线

哈佛大学开源 AI 训练数据集“Institutional Books 1.0”,涵盖馆藏 98.3 万本图书

哈佛大学法学院图书馆开源首个AI训练数据集“Institutional Books 1.0”,涵盖98.3万本图书、2420亿Token,支持245种语言。40%为英语,60%为其他语言,书籍主要来自19-20世纪。未来还将加入数百万份历史报纸数字化内容。#AI训练# #开源数据#
6/16/2025 10:27:21 PM
漾仔
  • 1